Artificial intelligence has entered the world of music faster than any technology before it. In just a few years, algorithms have gone from experimental tools to creative partners — composing soundtracks, generating royalty-free tracks, and producing in seconds what once took hours. For an industry built on emotion and expression, this evolution brings both excitement and unease.
AI has made music creation accessible to everyone, from filmmakers and podcasters to marketing teams. A few prompts can now produce a cinematic score, a lo-fi beat, or an ambient soundscape. But with this new efficiency comes an old question in a new form: can machines truly create music — or do they simply replicate what humans have already taught them?
This article examines the data behind this transformation: the growth of AI in the music industry, how listeners respond emotionally to human versus algorithmic composition, and how authenticity is reshaping the royalty-free and stock-music markets.
The Numbers Behind the Revolution: How AI Music Is Expanding
AI has moved from experiment to infrastructure in the music world.
According to Grand View Research (2024), the global AI-in-music market was worth USD 440 million in 2023 and should reach USD 2.79 billion by 2030—a 30 percent CAGR. Another analysis by The Business Research Company projects a climb from USD 3.6 billion in 2024 to USD 4.5 billion in 2025, confirming the same upward curve.
Adoption is spreading just as quickly. A 2024 MusicRadar survey found that nearly 60 percent of musicians already use AI tools in production—mostly for mastering, arranging, or generating loops. What once required high-end studios can now be done in browser-based software that costs less than a plugin license.
Why the Boom?
- Accessibility: cloud platforms let anyone generate professional audio.
- Speed: an algorithm can compose a full soundtrack in minutes.
- Demand: short-form video, podcasts, and ads consume huge volumes of royalty-free music.
Where the Numbers Hide Risk?
Rapid growth brings new concerns.
- Oversupply: algorithms often recycle familiar chord progressions, flooding stock libraries with sound-alike tracks.
- Fraud: The Guardian (2025) reported that up to 70 percent of AI-generated streams on Deezer were automated or fake.
- Copyright ambiguity: since training data come from human works, authorship remains legally unclear.
AI’s expansion proves its efficiency—but every dataset and model still depends on human creativity. The technology scales music production; people still define its meaning.
Emotional Resonance: What Studies Reveal About Listener Perception
If artificial intelligence can now generate melodies that sound human, the question becomes: do listeners feel the same way when they hear them? A growing body of research suggests not quite.
A 2024 study in PLOS One compared emotional reactions to AI-generated and human-composed music. Eighty-eight participants were monitored through heart-rate, skin-conductance, and self-reported emotion. The results were decisive: both types of music triggered feelings, but human compositions scored consistently higher for expressiveness, authenticity, and memorability. Many respondents described AI music as “technically correct” but “emotionally flat.”
The difference isn’t just in sound — it’s in perception. A 2024 Journal of the Acoustical Society of America experiment played identical tracks to two groups, labelling one “AI-made” and the other “human-composed.” Even though the recordings were identical, the “AI” versions were rated as significantly less moving. Researchers called this the authorship bias: the simple belief that something is human-made deepens our emotional engagement with it.
These findings point to a simple truth: people don’t just hear music—they sense the mind behind it.
Strengths and Shortcomings: The Duality of AI Music
Artificial intelligence has changed the speed and scale of music creation. What once required hours of studio work can now be done in seconds. But the same features that make AI efficient also reveal its limits. The technology produces music quickly and consistently — not necessarily creatively.
Where AI Excels
- Speed and volume. AI tools such as AIVA, Soundful, or Amper can generate complete compositions in under a minute. For producers working on tight deadlines, this means more music in less time. Industry estimates show that AI-assisted workflows can reduce production time by up to 80%, especially for repetitive or background-oriented projects.
- Affordability. A 2024 MusicRadar report found that 68% of independent creators use AI because it’s cost-effective. Small agencies, podcasters, and digital marketers can now access professional-sounding tracks without the cost of commissioning composers.
- Consistency. AI excels at generating music that fits a brief — atmospheric, cinematic, corporate — with predictable results. For functional uses like background scoring, this precision can be an advantage.
Where AI Falls Short
- Repetition and predictability. Because algorithms compose by analyzing existing data, they often reproduce familiar structures. A MIT Media Lab (2025) study of 10,000 AI-generated tracks found that over 70% shared nearly identical chord progressions. The result is music that sounds polished but rarely surprises.
- Emotional depth. AI can simulate dynamics and rhythm, but it doesn’t feel or intend emotion. What sounds expressive is often statistical mimicry, not genuine sentiment.
- Legal uncertainty. Since most AI systems learn from copyrighted material, ownership remains unresolved. This makes royalty-free licensing risky when authorship cannot be verified.
AI may have mastered composition as a process, but not as an experience. It can organise sound; humans give that sound purpose.
Royalty-Free Music in the AI Age: Authenticity as a Value Signal
The royalty-free music market has become one of the fastest-growing segments of the audio industry, reaching USD 1.4 billion in 2024 and projected to exceed USD 2 billion by 2030 (Research and Markets, 2024). This growth is driven by the explosion of video content, online advertising, and social media—fields that demand accessible, license-safe music on a massive scale.
At first glance, AI seemed like the perfect solution. Algorithms can now generate thousands of tracks in a fraction of the time it takes a human composer. Yet this abundance has created a new challenge: oversupply without distinction.
A Market Flooded, but Less Original
As AI-generated music fills stock libraries, many producers report that tracks sound increasingly similar. In a 2025 SoundCredit survey, 81 percent of video editors said AI-composed stock music “lacks personality,” while two-thirds noted they now spend more time searching for a track that fits the right mood. More music hasn’t made the creative process easier—it’s made it noisier.
A 2024 Nielsen analysis found that advertisements using original human-composed soundtracks achieved 23 percent higher audience retention and 18 percent stronger emotional response than those built on generic or AI-generated audio.
Authenticity as a Value Signal
In this new environment, authenticity itself has become an economic advantage. The SyncVault 2025 Trends Report showed that 74 percent of content creators now prefer to license music from identifiable human composers, citing creative trust and legal clarity.
For royalty-free platforms built on human artistry—such as Bensound’s Royalty-Free Library—this shift is pivotal.
AI has made music abundant. Human creativity keeps it meaningful.
Collaboration, Not Competition: The Hybrid Future of Music Creation
The future of music production is not a rivalry between human and artificial intelligence—it’s a partnership. AI is no longer viewed purely as a threat to creativity but increasingly as a creative collaborator. For many professionals, it serves as an assistant that accelerates workflow without replacing artistry.
How Hybrid Workflows Work
- AI as a Sketch Tool: Algorithms generate harmonic ideas, rhythmic loops, or textural layers.
- Human Refinement: Composers then arrange, adapt, and add expressive phrasing to fit the story.
- Production Balance: Machines handle repetition and speed; humans preserve coherence and feeling.
This collaboration model is transforming creative teams. It allows producers and filmmakers to experiment more freely while maintaining control over tone and emotional direction.
The Future of Creativity: Trust, Transparency, and the Human Touch
As artificial intelligence becomes an integral part of music creation, transparency is emerging as the defining standard of creative integrity. Listeners, artists, and businesses now expect to know how a track was made and who — or what — made it. The conversation has shifted from capability to accountability.
Implications for Royalty-Free Platforms
In the royalty-free music space, this demand for transparency is reshaping business models. Libraries that mix AI and human content without disclosure risk losing user trust and facing legal uncertainty. The next generation of music platforms is responding by:
- Certifying human authorship and providing clear metadata
- Labeling tracks according to origin and production method
- Ensuring licensing terms explicitly cover AI-assisted creation
Authenticity as a Competitive Edge
This clarity benefits creators and clients alike. Verified human compositions are expected to command higher licensing rates and better search visibility as algorithms prioritize authenticity. For stock music platforms like Bensound, which focus on independent artists, transparent authorship isn’t just compliance — it’s a differentiator.
Transparency is no longer optional; it’s the foundation of trust in a hybrid creative world.
Every era of music has been shaped by innovation. The piano replaced the harpsichord; synthesizers redefined sound; digital tools transformed production. Artificial intelligence is simply the next milestone — faster, broader, and more powerful than any before it. Yet no matter how advanced the tools become, music’s essence remains unchanged: it is the art of translating human emotion into sound.
AI has learned to imitate what people feel, but not why they feel it. That distinction is subtle yet fundamental. Listeners may appreciate algorithmic precision, but they connect with imperfection — with phrasing, timing, and texture that reveal a living mind behind the sound.
In the end, technology will continue to evolve, but emotion will endure. Music’s true power lies not in efficiency or replication, but in empathy — the invisible exchange between creator and listener. Long after algorithms perfect the process, it will still be the human touch that gives music its soul.
Comments are closed.